Cambridge conservation project – First Court refurbishment
We’re proud to have supported the Cambridge conservation project at First Court as structural engineers. The scheme has now been recognised at the Greater Cambridge Design & Construction Awards 2026.
The project won the award for Best Conservation, Alteration, or Extension of an Existing Building (under £3m construction value). In addition, the team received a commendation for craftsmanship.
Project overview
The Cambridge conservation project focused on the careful refurbishment of a highly sensitive historic building. It formed part of a wider three-phase programme, with particular attention given to the Collyweston-tiled roofs.
During the works, the team faced several challenges. These included sourcing appropriate materials and reopening a quarry. Access to the site was also difficult, so materials had to be moved using a series of hoists and gantries.
Our role as structural engineers
We supported the Cambridge conservation project by delivering structural solutions that respected the existing building. Our work helped preserve the historic fabric while ensuring the structure remained safe and functional.
In addition, we worked closely with the wider project team to coordinate the design and delivery. This helped keep the construction process efficient despite the constraints of the site.
For more information on conservation and engineering standards, visit the Institution of Civil Engineers.
Challenges and technical delivery
The Cambridge conservation project required careful planning and coordination at every stage. We designed structural interventions that allowed the roof to be extensively rebuilt while maintaining its historic appearance.
As a result, the finished structure closely reflects its fifteenth-century form. The team also carried out detailed work to support the repair and protection of the stained glass windows overlooking St Andrew’s Street.
Judges’ comments
The judges described the scheme as a “glorious project” and praised it as an excellent example of the repair and reuse of a historic building. They also highlighted the quality of the craftsmanship and the complexity of the work involved.
Overall, the judges recognised the project as a “worthy winner.”
